Summe der Potenzen von 2


31

Die Herausforderung

Bei einer Ganzzahleingabe von xwhere 1 <= x <= 255werden die Ergebnisse von Zweierpotenzen zurückgegeben, die bei Summierung ergeben x.

Beispiele

Angesichts der Eingabe:

86

Ihr Programm sollte folgendes ausgeben:

64 16 4 2

Eingang:

240

Ausgabe:

128 64 32 16

Eingang:

1

Ausgabe:

1

Eingang:

64

Ausgabe:

64

Der Ausgang kann Nullen enthalten, wenn die bestimmte Zweierpotenz nicht in der Summe vorhanden ist.

Zum Beispiel Eingabe 65 ausgegeben werden 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 1.

Wertung

Das ist , also gewinnt die kürzeste Antwort in jeder Sprache.


5
Muss die Liste von oben nach unten sortiert werden?
Adám

2
Dürfen wir einige redundante Nullen ausgeben?
Jonathan Allan

4
RE: "Hoch nach Niedrig sortiert" Warum eine Einschränkung hinzufügen, die nicht Teil der Herausforderung war und die meisten vorhandenen Antworten ungültig macht? (Und was ist mit Little-Endian ?!) + Es macht meine Python-Antwort ungültig, da Sets keine Reihenfolge haben.
Jonathan Allan

5
@ JonathanAllan Ich habe die Einschränkung aufgehoben. Das werde ich mir merken, wenn ich das nächste Mal eine andere Frage stelle - ich bin noch ziemlich neu darin. :)
SpookyGengar

6
Vielleicht möchten Sie angeben, dass eine Zweierpotenz nur einmal verwendet werden darf. Andernfalls könnte jemand "1 1 1" für den Eingang 3 ausgeben.
Black Owl Kai

Antworten:


38

JavaScript (ES6), 28 Byte

f=n=>n?[...f(n&~-n),n&-n]:[]

Probieren Sie es online!


9
Du bist die einzige Person auf der ganzen Welt, die mich dazu bringen kann, JavaScript-Antworten zu verbessern!
Sergiol

4
@sergiol, warum würdest du normalerweise keine JS-Lösung unterstützen? Eine gute Lösung ist eine gute Lösung, unabhängig davon, in welcher Sprache oder von wem sie veröffentlicht wurde.
Shaggy

@ Shaggy Weil Arnauld die einzige Person zu sein scheint, die solche Javascript-Lösungen macht. Seine Antworten sind pure Genialität!
Sergiol

3
@sergiol Danke für das Kompliment, aber das stimmt nicht ganz. Ich bin regelmäßig überfordert von klügeren Antworten - und darum geht es auf dieser Website. ^^
Arnauld

@ Oliver Ich bin nicht sicher. Führende Nullen (vor 128) sind anscheinend verboten. Ansonsten ist eine andere mögliche Variante f=n=>n&&f(n&~-n)+[,n&-n].
Arnauld

12

Pure Bash, 20

echo $[2**{7..0}&$1]

Try it online!

Erläuterung

          {7..0}     # Brace expansion: 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
       2**{7..0}     # Brace expansion: 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1
       2**{7..0}&$1  # Brace expansion: 128&n 64&n 32&n 16&n 8&n 4&n 2&n 1&n (Bitwise AND)
     $[2**{7..0}&$1] # Arithmetic expansion
echo $[2**{7..0}&$1] # and output

12

Jelly, 4 bytes

-2 since we may output zeros in place of unused powers of 2 :)

Ḷ2*&

Try it online!

How?

Ḷ2*& - Link: integer, n         e.g. 10
Ḷ    - lowered range of n            [  0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9]
 2*  - two to the power of           [  1,  2,  4,  8, 16, 32, 64,128,256,512]
   & - bit-wise and                  [  0,  2,  0,  8,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0]

11

Jelly, 6 bytes

BUT’2*

Try it online!

Explanation

BUT here is an explanation (note: I had assumed that we may only output the powers of 2 themselves and nothing else):

BUT’2* – Monadic link. Takes a number N as input. Example: 86
B      – Convert N to binary.                              [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]
 U     – Reverse.                                          [0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1]
  T    – Truthy indices.                                   [2, 3, 5, 7]
   ’   – Decrement.                                        [1, 2, 4, 6]
    2* – Raise 2 to that power.                            [2, 4, 16, 64]

X{x1,x2,x3,,xn}xi{0,1},i1,n¯

X=i=1nxi2ni
The indices i such that xi=0 obviously have no contribution so we're only interested in finding those such that xi=1. Since subtracting i from n is not convenient (the powers of two all have exponents of the form ni, where i is any index of a 1), instead of finding the truthy indices in this list we reverse it and then find them "backwards" with UT. Now that we've found the correct indices all we have to do is raise 2 to those powers.


1
"ASCII-only" Sneaky there...
Erik the Outgolfer

1
@EriktheOutgolfer I guess BUT2*H would work though.
Mr. Xcoder

1
Pretty impressive that this works with an input of 302231454903657293676544.
Michael Karas


8

APL (Dyalog Extended), 7 bytesSBCS

Anonymous tacit prefix function. Requires 0-based indexing (⎕IO←0).

2*⍸⍢⌽⍤⊤

Try it online!

2 two
* raised to the power of
 the ɩndices where true
 while
 reversed
 of
 the binary representation


8

Sledgehammer 0.2, 3 bytes

⡔⡸⢣

Decompresses into {intLiteral[2],call[NumberExpand,2]}.

Sledgehammer is a compressor for Wolfram Language code using Braille as a code page. The actual size of the above is 2.75 bytes, but due to current rules on meta, padding to the nearest byte is counted in code size.


2
Huh! Neat little language, and all the characters are actually printable.
LegionMammal978

And now I can't get the Peter Gabriel song out of my mind...
Digital Trauma

8

05AB1E, 3 bytes

Ýo&

Port of @JonathanAllan's Jelly answer, so make sure to upvote him!

Contains zeros (including -loads of- trailing zeros).

Try it online or verify all test cases.

Explanation:

Ý      # Create a list in the range [0, (implicit) input]
       #  i.e. 15 → [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
       #  i.e. 16 → [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]
 o     # Take 2 to the power of each value
       #  → [1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768]
       #  → [1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768,65536]
  &    # Bitwise-AND each value with the (implicit) input
       # 15 → [1,2,4,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
       # 16 → [0,0,0,0,16,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
       # (and output the result implicitly)

1
... what?! Never honestly seen bitwise and used in osabie. Nice one.
Magic Octopus Urn

@MagicOctopusUrn I indeed also don't use it very often. Can't even find any other answer I've used & in. xD I have used Bitwise-XOR a couple of times, like here or here and Bitwise-NOT once here (which I later removed again after golfing further..). I do use Bitwise-AND, XOR, OR, NOT, SHIFT, etc. pretty often in Java, but in 05AB1E not so much. :)
Kevin Cruijssen



7

R, 27 23 bytes

bitwAnd(scan(),2^(7:0))

Try it online!

Unrolled code and explanation :

A = scan()         # get input number A from stdin
                   # e.g. A = 65

bitwAnd( A , 2^(7:0))  # bitwise AND between all powers of 2 : 2^7 ... 2^0 and A
                       # and implicitly print the result
                       # e.g. B = bitwAnd(65, c(128,64,32,16,8,4,2,1)) = c(0,64,0,0,0,0,0,1)
  • 4 bytes thanks to @Kirill L.

1
23 bytes with bitwise and.
Kirill L.

@KirillL.: brilliant !
digEmAll

7

C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 29 bytes

Contains 5 unprintable characters.

n=>"€@ ".Select(a=>a&n)

Explanation

//Lambda taking one parameter 'n'
n=>
//String with ASCII characters 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, and 1
"€@ "
//Iterate through all the chars of the above string and transform them to
.Select(a=>
//A bitwise AND operation between the integer value of the current char and the input value
a&n)

Try it online!


But we need to get rid of zeros, like n=>new int[8].Select((j,i)=>1<<i&n).Where(i=>i!=0) The part before Where is five bytes shorter btw
polfosol ఠ_ఠ

@polfosol The output may contain zeros
Jo King

2
@JoKing Still, n=>new int[8].Select((j,i)=>1<<i&n) is 35 bytes long and we won't need additional flags and text encodings.
polfosol ఠ_ఠ

1
Using ascii characters 0-7 should be shorter, eg n=>"INSERT ASCII HERE".Select(a=>1<<a&n) But I'm on a mobile device that can't display or type unprintables, so I'll have to wait till I get home to update the answer
Embodiment of Ignorance

6

C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 38 bytes

x=>{for(int y=8;y-->0;Print(x&1<<y));}

Try it online!



1
Fails for inputs 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, etc. (the x>y should be x>=y instead).
Kevin Cruijssen

1
@ASCIIOnly - I'm telling you, the range operator is going to be sweet :)
dana

@ASCII-only Mean while, you can use the flag /u:System.Linq.Enumerable and try this for 31 bytes
Embodiment of Ignorance

@EmbodimentofIgnorance sure. but i'd prefer not to list language as "C# /u:System.Linq.Enumerable" :P
ASCII-only


5

05AB1E, 7 bytes

2вRƶ<oò

explanation:

2в        convert input to binary array
R         reverse array
ƶ<        multiply each item by it's index and subtract 1
oò        2^item then round down

Try it online!


Also works with input of 302231454903657293676544
Michael Karas



5

C (clang), 133 110 63 58 bytes

58-byte solution thanks to @ceilingcat.

x=256;main(y){for(scanf("%d",&y);x/=2;)printf("%d ",y&x);}

Try it online!


In C89, you can declare like main(){} and the return type defaults to int. Same for variables at global scope. Also, at least on normal implementations like clang, printf and scanf work without prototypes. You get warnings of course, but it's still valid C89 (maybe) or at least K&R C for them to be implicitly declared. The types of the C objects you pass as args defines how they're passed, so a char* and int* will Just Work without truncating pointers to 32-bit on x86-64 or anything. (Default argument promotions happen, same as for variadic functions which they are anyway.)
Peter Cordes

Or is this aiming to be valid C11 with no undefined behaviour? If so, proudly proclaim it. :) And BTW, writing a function that takes an output array as an arg would probably be smaller. Anyway, see Tips for golfing in C
Peter Cordes

You can use bitwise & to check if a bit is set. Like y&(1<<x)&&printf("%d ",1<<x);. Or to not skip zeros, just printf("%d ", y&(1<<x)). Or instead of counting bit positions, use x=256 and x>>=1 to shift the mask. main(y){int x=256;for(scanf("%d",&y);x>>=1;)printf("%d ",y&x);} 63 bytes Try it online! clang will even compile that with -std=c11
Peter Cordes


4

MATL, 5 bytes

BPfqW

Try it online!

Explanation

Consider input 86 as an example.

B    % Implicit input. Convert to binary (highest to lowest digits)
     % STACK: [1 0 1 0 1 1 0]
P    % Flip
     % STACK: [0 1 1 0 1 0 1]
f    % Find: indices of nonzeros (1-based)
     % STACK: [2 3 5 7]
q    % Subtract 1, element-wise
     % STACK: [1 2 4 6]
W    % Exponential with base 2, element-wise. Implicit display
     % STACK: [2 4 16 64]

4

Perl 6, 16 12 bytes

-4 bytes thanks to Jonathan Allan

*+&2**all ^8

Try it online!

Returns an All Junction with 8 elements. This is a rather non-standard way of returning, but generally, Junctions can act as ordered (at least until autothreading is implemented) lists and it is possible to extract the values from one.

Explanation:

*+&              # Bitwise AND the input with
   2**           # 2 raised to the power of
      all ^8     # All of the range 0 to 7

4

Japt, 8 5 bytes

Æ&2pX

Try it

Æ&2pX     :Implicit input of integer U
Æ         :Map each X in the range [0,U)
 &        :  Bitwise AND of U with
  2pX     :  2 to the power of X

Alternative

Suggested by Oliver to avoid the 0s in the output using the -mf flag.

N&2pU

Try it

N&2pU     :Implicitly map each U in the range [0,input)
N         :The (singleton) array of inputs
 &        :Bitwise AND with
  2pX     :2 to the power of U
          :Implicitly filter and output

1
Nice one. You can do N&2pU with -mf to avoid the 0s
Oliver




4

K (oK), 19 16 bytes

-3 bytes thanks to ngn!

{*/x#2}'&|(8#2)\

Try it online!

oK does not have power operator, that's why I need a helper function {*/x#2} (copy 2 x times and reduce the resulting list by multiplication)


you can omit the { x}
ngn

@ngn Thanks! I tried it and it worked, but I wasn't sure it is acceptible.
Galen Ivanov

4

Alchemist, 125 bytes

_->In_x+128a+m
m+x+a->m+b
m+0x+a->n+a
m+0a->o+Out_b+Out_" "
n+b->n+x+c
n+0b+a->n+c
n+0a->p
o+b->o+c
o+0b->p
p+2c->p+a
p+0c->m

Try it online! or Test every input!

Explanation

_->In_x+128a+m           # Initialize universe with input, 128a (value to compare to) and m (state)
m+x+a->m+b               # If c has been halved, subtract min(a, x) from a and x and put its value into b
m+0x+a->n+a              # If x < a, continue to state n
m+0a->o+Out_b+Out_" "    # Else print and continue to state o
n+b->n+x+c               # Add min(a, x) (i.e. x) back to x, and add it to c (we're collecting a back into c)
n+0b+a->n+c              # Then, add the rest of a to c
n+0a->p                  # Then, go to state p
o+b->o+c                 # Add min(a, x) (i.e. a) to c - x _is_ greater than a and so contains it in its binary representation, so we're not adding back to x
o+0b->p                  # Then, go to state p
p+2c->p+a                # Halve c into a
p+0c->m                  # Then go to state m

4

PHP, 41 39 bytes

for($c=256;$c>>=1;)echo$argv[1]&$c,' ';

Try it online!

Or 38 with no fun >>= operator and PHP 5.6+:

for($x=8;$x--;)echo$argv[1]&2**$x,' ';

Or 36 with little-endian ("0 2 4 0 16 0 64 0") output:

while($x<8)echo$argv[1]&2**$x++,' ';

Really I just wanted to use the >>= operator, so I'm sticking with the 39.

Tests:

$php pow2.php 86
0 64 0 16 0 4 2 0

$php pow2.php 240
128 64 32 16 0 0 0 0

$php pow2.php 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

$php pow2.php 64
0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0

$php pow2.php 65
0 64 0 0 0 0 0 1

4

TSQL, 43 39 bytes

Can't find a shorter fancy solution, so here is a standard loop. -4 bytes thanks to MickyT and KirillL

DECLARE @y int=255

,@ int=128s:PRINT @y&@ SET @/=2IF @>0GOTO s

Try it out


using the bitwise and (&) you can save a few with the following ,@ int=128s:print @y&@ set @/=2IF @>0GOTO s. This is hinted by @KirillL for the R answer
MickyT

@MickyT that worked like a charm. Thanks a lot
t-clausen.dk


3

C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 33 bytes

n=>{for(;n>0;n&=n-1)Print(n&-n);}

Port of @Arnauld's JavaScript (ES6) answer, so make sure to upvote him!

Try it online.

Explanation:

n=>{            // Method with integer parameter and no return-type
  for(;n>0      //  Continue looping as long as `n` is larger than 0:
      ;         //    After every iteration:
       n&=n-1)  //     Bitwise-AND `n` by `n-1`
    Print(      //   Print with trailing newline:
      n&-n);}   //    `n` bitwise-AND `-n`
Durch die Nutzung unserer Website bestätigen Sie, dass Sie unsere Cookie-Richtlinie und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben.
Licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required.