Ich bin mir nicht sicher, wonach Sie suchen, aber dieses Programm:
public class Building
{
public enum StatusType
{
open,
closed,
weird,
};
public string Name { get; set; }
public StatusType Status { get; set; }
}
public static List <Building> buildingList = new List<Building> ()
{
new Building () { Name = "one", Status = Building.StatusType.open },
new Building () { Name = "two", Status = Building.StatusType.closed },
new Building () { Name = "three", Status = Building.StatusType.weird },
new Building () { Name = "four", Status = Building.StatusType.open },
new Building () { Name = "five", Status = Building.StatusType.closed },
new Building () { Name = "six", Status = Building.StatusType.weird },
};
static void Main (string [] args)
{
var statusList = new List<Building.StatusType> () { Building.StatusType.open, Building.StatusType.closed };
var q = from building in buildingList
where statusList.Contains (building.Status)
select building;
foreach ( var b in q )
Console.WriteLine ("{0}: {1}", b.Name, b.Status);
}
erzeugt die erwartete Ausgabe:
one: open
two: closed
four: open
five: closed
Dieses Programm vergleicht eine Zeichenfolgendarstellung der Aufzählung und erzeugt dieselbe Ausgabe:
public class Building
{
public enum StatusType
{
open,
closed,
weird,
};
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Status { get; set; }
}
public static List <Building> buildingList = new List<Building> ()
{
new Building () { Name = "one", Status = "open" },
new Building () { Name = "two", Status = "closed" },
new Building () { Name = "three", Status = "weird" },
new Building () { Name = "four", Status = "open" },
new Building () { Name = "five", Status = "closed" },
new Building () { Name = "six", Status = "weird" },
};
static void Main (string [] args)
{
var statusList = new List<Building.StatusType> () { Building.StatusType.open, Building.StatusType.closed };
var statusStringList = statusList.ConvertAll <string> (st => st.ToString ());
var q = from building in buildingList
where statusStringList.Contains (building.Status)
select building;
foreach ( var b in q )
Console.WriteLine ("{0}: {1}", b.Name, b.Status);
Console.ReadKey ();
}
Ich habe diese Erweiterungsmethode erstellt, um eine IEnumerable in eine andere zu konvertieren, bin mir aber nicht sicher, wie effizient sie ist. Möglicherweise wird nur eine Liste hinter den Kulissen erstellt.
public static IEnumerable <TResult> ConvertEach (IEnumerable <TSource> sources, Func <TSource,TResult> convert)
{
foreach ( TSource source in sources )
yield return convert (source);
}
Dann können Sie die where-Klausel in Folgendes ändern:
where statusList.ConvertEach <string> (status => status.GetCharValue()).
Contains (v.Status)
und überspringen Sie das Erstellen des List<string>
mit ConvertAll ()
am Anfang.
Contains()
Methode anbietet , und dann wird mir klar, dass esAny()
stattdessen so sein soll . +1